Opinion
June, 1933.
Present — Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ.; Lazansky, P.J., not voting.
Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied as unnecessary. (See Meo v. Bloomgarden, 262 N.Y. 72, 73.)
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
New York Investors, Inc. v. Tinus Building Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1933
240 App. Div. 725 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)
Summaries of
New York Investors, Inc. v. Tinus Building Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1933
240 App. Div. 725 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)
Case details for
New York Investors, Inc. v. Tinus Building Corp.
Case Details
Full title:NEW YORK INVESTORS, INC., Respondent, Appellant, v. TINUS BUILDING…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: Jun 1, 1933
Citations
240 App. Div. 725 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)