From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

New York Central Railroad Company v. Pender

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 19, 1951
101 N.E.2d 762 (N.Y. 1951)

Opinion

Argued October 9, 1951

Decided October 19, 1951

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, NOONAN, J.

Mark N. Turner for appellants.

Albert J. Waterman and George W. Watson for respondents.


Judgments reversed and judgment directed in favor of plaintiffs as demanded in the complaint, without costs. We construe the words "the authority having jurisdiction", in subdivision 17 of section 14 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law, to mean public officers or bodies only and not to include railroad companies over whose tracks there are maintained bridges carrying public highways. No opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ.


Summaries of

New York Central Railroad Company v. Pender

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 19, 1951
101 N.E.2d 762 (N.Y. 1951)
Case details for

New York Central Railroad Company v. Pender

Case Details

Full title:NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY et al., Appellants, v. IRVING PENDER, as…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 19, 1951

Citations

101 N.E.2d 762 (N.Y. 1951)
101 N.E.2d 762

Citing Cases

Akers Mot. Lines v. City of N.Y

City of New York argues that neither the common law nor subdivision (d) of section 1640 obligates it to post…

People v. Rodenbach

(Hennessy v. Walker, 279 N.Y. 94.) (NOTE: In the year following the last-mentioned decision of the Court of…