Opinion
2010-10100 Index No. 10185/10 M157590
06-07-2013
In the Matter of New Surfside Nursing Home, LLC, et al., appellants, v. Richard F. Daines, etc., et al., respondents.
, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
LEONARD B. AUSTIN
ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION
Motion by the appellants for leave to reargue an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated September 15, 2010, which was determined by decision and order of this Court dated February 6, 2013, or, in the alternative, for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from the decision and order of this Court.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to reargue is denied; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals is granted, and the following question is certified to the Court of Appeals: Was the decision and order of this Court dated February 6, 2013, properly made?
Questions of law have arisen, which, in our opinion, ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals (see CPLR 5713).
DICKERSON, J.P., CHAMBERS, AUSTIN and MILLER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court