New Mexico ex rel. Balderas v. Rovio Entm't Corp.

Full title: STATE OF NEW MEXICO ex rel. HECTOR BALDERAS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Plaintiff…

Court: United States District Court, District of New Mexico

Date published: Nov 1, 2022

1:21-cv-00824-DHU-KK (D.N.M. Nov. 1, 2022)

Opinion

1:21-cv-00824-DHU-KK

11-01-2022

STATE OF NEW MEXICO ex rel. HECTOR BALDERAS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Plaintiff, v. ROVIO ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, Defendant.

JOINTLY SUBMITTED AND APPROVED BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK, LLP Eric R. Burris Debashree (“Reema”) Nandy Joseph C. Haupt Joshua S. Brown Aldo Ponterosso Abraham A. Tabaie SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP Attorneys for Defendant Rovio Entertainment Corporation CARNEY BATES & PULLIAM, PLLC Allen Carney (pro hac vice) Hank Bates (pro hac vice) ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW MEXICO HECTOR H. BALDERAS P. Cholla Khoury Brian E. McMath New Mexico Office of the Attorney General Consumer & Environmental Protection Division Attorneys for Plaintiff

KIRTAN KHALSA, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

JOINTLY SUBMITTED AND APPROVED

BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK, LLP

Eric R. Burris

Debashree (“Reema”) Nandy

Joseph C. Haupt

Joshua S. Brown

Aldo Ponterosso

Abraham A. Tabaie

SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP

Attorneys for Defendant Rovio Entertainment Corporation

CARNEY BATES & PULLIAM, PLLC

Allen Carney (pro hac vice)

Hank Bates (pro hac vice)

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW MEXICO

HECTOR H. BALDERAS

P. Cholla Khoury

Brian E. McMath

New Mexico Office of the Attorney General

Consumer & Environmental Protection Division

Attorneys for Plaintiff

ORDER

KIRTAN KHALSA, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Upon Joint Motion of the Parties and good cause shown, the twenty-one (21) day deadline set forth in D.N.M.LR-Civ 26.6 and 37.1 to file a Motion to Compel relating to the Defendant's Responses to the Plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production is hereby suspended until further Order of the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.