From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

New Jersey Steel Acquisition Corp. v. Von Roll AG.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 21, 1990
162 A.D.2d 297 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

June 21, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (David B. Saxe, J.).


Our review of the record reveals that defendants failed to establish their defense sufficiently to warrant a court directing judgment in their favor as a matter of law. (See, Gilbert Frank Corp. v. Federal Ins. Co., 70 N.Y.2d 966, 967.) Material issues of fact exist concerning whether plaintiff New Jersey Steel Acquisition Corporation had obtained the requisite financial commitments from various lending institutions to allow it to proceed with the leveraged buyout of defendants' New Jersey steel mill, in accordance with a prescribed timetable, before defendant terminated the parties' stock purchase agreement in May 1984. We note that the various depositions upon which defendants place reliance did not resolve the dispute.

Concur — Ross, J.P., Carro, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

New Jersey Steel Acquisition Corp. v. Von Roll AG.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 21, 1990
162 A.D.2d 297 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

New Jersey Steel Acquisition Corp. v. Von Roll AG.

Case Details

Full title:NEW JERSEY STEEL ACQUISITION CORPORATION, Respondent, v. VON ROLL AG. et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 21, 1990

Citations

162 A.D.2d 297 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
556 N.Y.S.2d 644

Citing Cases

Urena v. the City of New York

Where there exists any issue of material fact that is in dispute and a defendant fails "to establish their…