Opinion
May 4, 1999
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Huff, J.).
Plaintiff's motion to quash was properly denied, since the information sought by defendants' subpoena duces tecum was not "`utterly irrelevant to any proper inquiry'" (Ayubo v. Eastman Kodak Co., 158 A.D.2d 641, 642; Pagan v. City of New York, 180 A.D.2d 545). We have considered plaintiff's additional arguments and find them unavailing.
Concur — Tom, J. P., Wallach, Lerner and Rubin, JJ.