Opinion
No. 20190405
05-07-2020
NEW FREEDOM CENTER, INC. , Petitioner and Appellant v. JOB SERVICE NORTH DAKOTA , Respondent and Appellee and James L. Maurer, Respondent
Monte L. Rogneby, Bismarck, ND, for petitioner and appellant. Michael T. Pitcher, Assistant Attorney General, Bismarck, ND, for respondent and appellee.
Monte L. Rogneby, Bismarck, ND, for petitioner and appellant.
Michael T. Pitcher, Assistant Attorney General, Bismarck, ND, for respondent and appellee.
Per Curiam.
[¶1] New Freedom Center, Inc. ("NFC") appealed from a district court judgment affirming Job Service North Dakota’s ("Job Service") allowance of unemployment benefits to NFC’s former employee, James Maurer. NFC asserts Job Service erred when it found Maurer was not terminated for benefit-disqualifying misconduct. We conclude Job Service’s decision is supported by a preponderance of the evidence. See Baier v. Job Service N.D. , 2004 ND 27, ¶ 7, 673 N.W.2d 923 (applying preponderance of the evidence standard to misconduct determinations).
[¶2] NFC also argues Job Service erred when it refused to consider pornography that was allegedly discovered on Maurer’s work computer and when the appeals referee had an ex parte communication with Maurer. We conclude NFC waived these issues when its representative declined to testify about the pornography at the administrative hearing and when its representative did not object to the ex parte communication. See McNamara v. Dir., N.D. Dep't of Transp. , 500 N.W.2d 585, 593 (N.D. 1993) (holding failure to assert objection at administrative hearing precludes litigant from raising issue on appeal).
[¶3] We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5) and (7).
[¶4] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
Gerald W. VandeWalle
Lisa Fair McEvers
Daniel J. Crothers
Jerod E. Tufte