From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

New Falls Corp. v. Simmons

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 28, 2006
35 A.D.3d 327 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

No. 9964N.

December 28, 2006.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth L. Thompson, Jr., J.), entered October 17, 2005, which, after a hearing, denied appellant's motion to vacate the judgment of foreclosure and sale of unit 2D at 2200 East Tremont Avenue, vacate the referee's deed, and dismiss the action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Doyle Broumand, LLP, Bronx (Michael B. Doyle of counsel), for appellant.

Vlock Associates, P.C., New York (Stephen Vlock of counsel), for New Falls Corporation, respondent.

Before: Friedman, J.P., Nardelli, Gonzalez, Catterson and Kavanagh, JJ.


The evidence, fairly considered, permitted the disposition reached by the hearing court, particularly since the court's findings were premised largely on assessment of witness credibility ( see Watts v State of New York, 25 AD3d 324). Appellant failed to meet its burden to prove that plaintiff had actual knowledge of the unrecorded "corrected" deed.


Summaries of

New Falls Corp. v. Simmons

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 28, 2006
35 A.D.3d 327 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

New Falls Corp. v. Simmons

Case Details

Full title:NEW FALLS CORPORATION, Respondent, v. CLARENCE SIMMONS et al., Defendants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 28, 2006

Citations

35 A.D.3d 327 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 10146
825 N.Y.S.2d 362

Citing Cases

IBE Trade Corp. v. Litvinenko

However, defendant's argument that certain evidence should not have been received is unpreserved for review (…