From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

New England Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Doe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 6, 1998
249 A.D.2d 285 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

April 6, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Bergerman, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Rockland County, for entry of a judgment declaring that the plaintiff is obligated to pay benefits to the defendant under the subject insurance policy.

The Supreme Court properly found that the "Incontestability" clause of the subject policy and Insurance Law § 3216 (d) (1) (B) (ii) preclude the plaintiff from denying benefits to the defendant (see, Monarch Life Ins. Co. v. Brown, 125 A.D.2d 75; White v. Massachusetts Cas. Ins. Co., 96 A.D.2d 732).

We note that since this is a declaratory judgment action, the Supreme Court should have directed the entry of a declaration in favor of the defendant rather than dismissal of the complaint (see, Lanza v. Wagner, 11 N.Y.2d 317, 334, cert denied 371 U.S. 901).

O'Brien, J.P., Joy, Altman and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

New England Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Doe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 6, 1998
249 A.D.2d 285 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

New England Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:NEW ENGLAND MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. JOHN DOE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 6, 1998

Citations

249 A.D.2d 285 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
671 N.Y.S.2d 280

Citing Cases

Favata v. Paul Revere Life Insurance Company

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly determined that the…