Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

New Canaan Bank and Trust Company v. Cerretani

600 A.2d 332 (Conn. App. Ct. 1991)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
New Canaan Bank and Trust Company v. Cerretani

1 Citing case

  1. Holly Hill Holdings v. Lowman

    30 Conn. App. 204 (Conn. App. Ct. 1993)   Cited 21 times

    On the basis of this sequence of events, the defendants urge that § 430A should be given retroactive effect so as to invalidate either the original report or its supplement. This argument has previously been raised and rejected in New Canaan Bank Trust Co. v. Cerretani, 26 Conn. App. 929, 600 A.2d 332 (1991) (per curiam). In New Canaan Bank Trust, the attorney trial referee's report was filed on October 3, 1990, more than 120 days after the completion of the trial and two days after Practice Book § 430A became effective.