From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

New All. Fed. Credit Union v. Malarik

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 18, 2022
Civil Action 20-1048 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 18, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 20-1048

01-18-2022

NEW ALLIANCE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, Plaintiff v. JAMES M. MALARIK, Defendant.


ORDER

Cathy Bissoon, United States District Judge

Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Doc. 10) will be granted. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), removed “[c]ases may be remanded . . . for (1) lack of district court subject matter jurisdiction or (2) a defect in the removal procedure.” PAS v. Travelers Ins. Co., 7 F.3d 349, 352 (3d Cir. 1993). Here, the removal is procedurally defective because Defendant failed to attach the underlying state court complaint to the notice of removal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1446 (requiring a removing defendant to file a notice of removal “together with a copy of all process, pleadings, and orders served upon such defendant . . . .”). Additionally, based on a review of the docket, the Court is unable to discern any basis for exercising subject-matter jurisdiction over this case.

Consistent with the foregoing, Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Doc. 10) is GRANTED. This case shall be remanded forthwith to the Court of Common Pleas of Beaver County, Pennsylvania. The Clerk shall mark this case closed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

New All. Fed. Credit Union v. Malarik

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 18, 2022
Civil Action 20-1048 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 18, 2022)
Case details for

New All. Fed. Credit Union v. Malarik

Case Details

Full title:NEW ALLIANCE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, Plaintiff v. JAMES M. MALARIK…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 18, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 20-1048 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 18, 2022)