Opinion
3:21-cv-00319-RCJ-CSD
11-14-2022
Joshua D. Buck MARK R. THIERMAN, ESQ. JOSHUA D. BUCK, ESQ. LEAH L. JONES, ESQ. JOSHUA R. HENDRICKSON, ESQ. THIERMAN BUCK LLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs EMILY NEVETT and BONNIE NOBLE Emil S. Kim MONTGOMERY Y. PAEK, ESQ. ETHAN D. THOMAS, ESQ. DIANA G. DICKINSON, ESQ. EMIL S. KIM, ESQ. LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant RENOWN HEALTH
Joshua D. Buck MARK R. THIERMAN, ESQ. JOSHUA D. BUCK, ESQ. LEAH L. JONES, ESQ. JOSHUA R. HENDRICKSON, ESQ. THIERMAN BUCK LLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs EMILY NEVETT and BONNIE NOBLE
Emil S. Kim MONTGOMERY Y. PAEK, ESQ. ETHAN D. THOMAS, ESQ. DIANA G. DICKINSON, ESQ. EMIL S. KIM, ESQ. LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant RENOWN HEALTH
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE ITS REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS THE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT [FIRST REQUEST]
Plaintiffs EMILY NEVETT and BONNIE NOBLE (collectively “Plaintiffs”), and Defendant RENOWN HEALTH ("Defendant"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and request an order extending the time for Defendant to file its Reply brief in support of its Partial Motion to Dismiss the Third Amended Complaint (ECF No. 49). Specifically, the parties stipulate to extend the deadline by two weeks from the current deadline of November 16, 2022, up to and including November 30, 2022.
This extension is requested and sought prior to the expiration of the deadline in question and is needed to accommodate counsels' heavy workloads and the upcoming holidays. This is the first extension requested related to this deadline. The parties agree and represent to the Court that this request is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.
IT IS SO ORDERED.