From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Neun v. Deusen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 1, 1915
167 App. Div. 952 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)

Opinion

March, 1915.


Judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that there is no sufficient evidence to support the fifth, sixth, and seventh findings of fact to the effect that at the time the agreement was entered into between defendant and S.C. Wells Co., for the sale to said company of all the shares of stock of the B.H. Bacon Company, it was the purpose or understanding of the parties that the business of the B.H. Bacon Company was not to be continued, or that its assets and business were to be taken over and absorbed by S.C. Wells Co. Also that such a finding is necessary to support the conclusion of law. All concurred.


Summaries of

Neun v. Deusen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 1, 1915
167 App. Div. 952 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)
Case details for

Neun v. Deusen

Case Details

Full title:Henry P. Neun, Respondent, v. Amelia Van Deusen, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1915

Citations

167 App. Div. 952 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)
151 N.Y.S. 1132