Neuman v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

1 Citing case

  1. Neuman v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

    492 N.W.2d 530 (Minn. 1992)   Cited 7 times
    Stating policy ambiguities must be construed in favor of insured

    Is the amount recovered by the insured from the tortfeasor to be deducted three times, i.e., from each of the three coverages being stacked, or only once from the aggregate coverage? The trial court and the court of appeals ruled the offset should be applied seriatim. Neuman v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 480 N.W.2d 133 (Minn.App. 1992). We disagree and reverse.