From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Neudecker v. Philpot

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
May 2, 1949
174 F.2d 668 (D.C. Cir. 1949)

Opinion

No. 9910.

Argued April 20, 1949.

Decided May 2, 1949.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia (now the United States District Court for the District of Columbia).

Suit against Alexander Hughes Philpot for divorce. In dismissing the wife's complaint on her own motion, the District Court denied counsel fees to Raymond Neudecker and another, the wife's attorneys, and the attorneys appeal.

Case remanded for further order.

Mr. John Alexander, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Raymond Neudecker, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, appellants pro se.

Mr. David A. Hart, Washington, D.C., for appellee.

Before EDGERTON, WILBUR K. MILLER, and PRETTYMAN, Circuit Judges.


In dismissing on her own motion a wife's complaint for divorce, the District Court denied counsel fees to her attorneys. They appeal from this denial.

In view of a later colloquy between court and counsel, it is not clear to us from the court's memorandum and order whether (1) fees were denied on the theory that the court had no authority to award them in the circumstances of the particular case, or (2) the court decided, in the exercise of the discretion granted by the statute, D.C. Code 1940, § 16 — 410, that no fees should be awarded. We think the court had authority to award or deny fees and the exercise of its discretion was required. The case must therefore be remanded for a further order. If discretion was exercised by the appealed order, a new order denying fees or confirming the appealed order will be sufficient.


Summaries of

Neudecker v. Philpot

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
May 2, 1949
174 F.2d 668 (D.C. Cir. 1949)
Case details for

Neudecker v. Philpot

Case Details

Full title:NEUDECKER et al. v. PHILPOT

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: May 2, 1949

Citations

174 F.2d 668 (D.C. Cir. 1949)

Citing Cases

Ritz v. Ritz

Conceding, as she must, that the the award of counsel fees under Code Section 16-410 is discretionary,…

Clark v. Clark

Bates v. Bates, 79 U.S.App.D.C. 14, 141 F.2d 723. Neudecker v. Philpot, 85 U.S.App.D.C. 28, 174 F.2d 668;…