From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nettles v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Dec 8, 1925
106 So. 512 (Ala. Crim. App. 1925)

Opinion

1 Div. 622.

December 8, 1925.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Mobile County; C. A. Grayson, Judge.

Mamie Nettles, alias White, and Lillian Burnham, alias White, were convicted of violating the Prohibition Law, and they appeal. Affirmed.

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., and Thos. E. Knight, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

The granting of a severance was within the discretion of the court. Defendant may not demand a joint trial. Burkett v. State, 154 Ala. 19, 45 So. 682; Jackson v. State, 104 Ala. 1, 16 So. 523; Wright v. State, 108 Ala. 60, 18 So. 941; Yarbrough v. State, 105 Ala. 43, 16 So. 758.


The defendants were jointly indicted, tried, and convicted of the offense of violating the prohibition laws by selling prohibited liquor or having it in their possession, and appeal.

There is no merit in the exception reserved to the action of the trial court in ordering a severance as to Clarence Johnson, jointly indicted with defendants, but who had not been apprehended at the time of the trial. It was a matter within the sound discretion of the court. Charley v. State, 204 Ala. 687, 87 So. 177.

There is no bill of exceptions, and, no error being apparent on the record, the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Nettles v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Dec 8, 1925
106 So. 512 (Ala. Crim. App. 1925)
Case details for

Nettles v. State

Case Details

Full title:NETTLES et al. v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Dec 8, 1925

Citations

106 So. 512 (Ala. Crim. App. 1925)
106 So. 512