Opinion
2:22-cv-00203-JRG-RSP
01-31-2024
ORDER
RODNEY GILSTRAP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. et al. ("Micron") previously filed a Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,787,060 and 9,318,160 (Dkt. No. 279) and a Motion for Summary Judgment of No Pre-suit Damages (Dkt. No. 281). Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 429), recommending denial of Micron's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-infringement and granting-in-part of Micron's Motion for Summary Judgment of No Pre-suit Damages. Micron has now filed Objections (Dkt. No. 442).
After conducting a de novo review of the briefing on the Motion for Summary Judgment, the Report and Recommendation, and the briefing on Micron's Objections, the Court agrees with the reasoning provided within the Report and Recommendation and concludes that the Objections fail to show that the Report and Recommendation was erroneous. Consequently, the Court OVERRULES Micron's Objections and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and orders that the Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,787,060 and 9,318,160 (Dkt. No. 279) is DENIED and the Motion for Summary Judgment of No Pre-suit Damages (Dkt. No. 281) is GRANTED-IN-PART.
So ORDERED and SIGNED