From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Netapp, Inc. v. Crossroads Systems, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, Oakland Division
Jun 18, 2014
4:14-cv-01727-JSW (N.D. Cal. Jun. 18, 2014)

Opinion

          DUANE MORRIS LLP, Karineh Khachatourian, David T. Xue, Patrick S. Salceda, Palo Alto, CA, Attorneys for Plaintiff, NETAPP, INC.

          WONG CABELLO LUTSCH RUTHERFORD & BRUCCULERI, LLP, Russell T. Wong, Houston, TX, Attorneys for Defendant, CROSSROADS SYSTEMS, INC.


          STIPULATED VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(2) AND (c)(1) AND PROPOSED ORDER

          JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge.

         Plaintiff NetApp, Inc. ("NetApp") and Defendant Crossroads Systems, Inc. ("Crossroads"), pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2) and (c)(1), hereby move for an order dismissing NetApp's complaint for declaratory judgment of non-infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 7, 051, 147 ("the 147 Patent") and 7, 987, 311 ("the 311 Patent") without prejudice and all of Crossroads' counterclaims for infringement for the 147 Patent and 311 Patent against NetApp without prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs, expenses and attorneys' fees.

         IT IS SO STIPULATED:

         Respectfully submitted,

         [PROPOSED] ORDER

         CAME ON THIS DAY for consideration the Stipulated Voluntary Dismissal of all claims asserted by plaintiff NetApp, Inc. ("NetApp") and all counterclaims asserted by defendant Crossroads Systems, Inc. ("Crossroads") in the above captioned action, and the Court being of the opinion that said Stipulated Voluntary Dismissal should be GRANTED.

         It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that:

         (1) NetApp's complaint for declaratory judgment of non-infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 7, 051, 147 ("the 147 Patent") and 7, 987, 311 ("the 311 Patent") is hereby dismissed without prejudice;

         (2) Crossroads' Counterclaim for infringement of the 147 Patent and the 311 Patent is hereby dismissed without prejudice;

         (3) It is further ordered that all attorneys' fees, costs and expenses shall be borne by the party that incurred them; and

         (4) The Clerk is directed to close the file.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Netapp, Inc. v. Crossroads Systems, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, Oakland Division
Jun 18, 2014
4:14-cv-01727-JSW (N.D. Cal. Jun. 18, 2014)
Case details for

Netapp, Inc. v. Crossroads Systems, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:NETAPP, INC., Plaintiff, v. CROSSROADS SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, Oakland Division

Date published: Jun 18, 2014

Citations

4:14-cv-01727-JSW (N.D. Cal. Jun. 18, 2014)