Opinion
2015-1630
02-09-2016
NETAC TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., Appellant v. SANDISK CORPORATION, Appellee
WENYE TAN, Anova Law Group, PLLC, Sterling, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by XIAOQUN WU. DARRYL J. ADAMS, Baker Botts, LLP, Austin, TX, argued for appellee. Also represented by BRIAN W. OAKS; RUSSELL J. CRAIN, Dallas, TX.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, in No. 95/000,384.
JUDGMENT
WENYE TAN, Anova Law Group, PLLC, Sterling, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by XIAOQUN WU. DARRYL J. ADAMS, Baker Botts, LLP, Austin, TX, argued for appellee. Also represented by BRIAN W. OAKS; RUSSELL J. CRAIN, Dallas, TX. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MAYER and REYNA, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 9, 2016
Date
/s/ Daniel E. O'Toole
Daniel E. O'Toole
Clerk of Court