Opinion
Civil Action No. 12-CV-12511
03-29-2013
JOHN NESTEL, JR., Plaintiff, v. DANIEL MENAKE, et al., Defendants.
HON. MARK A. GOLDSMITH
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
The one-sentence "petition for restraint against transfer of property, money, and assets" (Dkt. 43), filed yesterday, is denied without prejudice for failure to comply with the following authority:
• E.D. Mich. LR 5.1(a)(2) (requiring pagination);Counsel is directed to familiarize himself with the rules governing motion practice and, in particular, the rules governing the issuance of temporary restraining orders, before filing any additional papers with this Court.
• E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(d)(1) (requiring motions to be accompanied by a brief);
• E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(d)(2) (requiring concise statement of issues presented and controlling or most appropriate authority for the relief sought);
• Rivet v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 316 F. App'x 440, 449 (6th Cir. 2009) (requiring that arguments be supported and developed);
• Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(b)(1) (requiring that motions state "with particularity the grounds for seeking the order").
SO ORDERED. Dated: March 29, 2013
Flint, Michigan
______________
MARK A. GOLDSMITH
United States District Judge
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court's ECF System to their respective email or First Class U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on March 29, 2013.
__________
DEBORAH J. GOLTZ
Case Manager