Opinion
June 30, 1992
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Beatrice Shainswit, J.).
The plaintiff demonstrated a likelihood of ultimate success on the merits, irreparable harm, and a balance of equities in his favor (Primo Enter. v. Bachner, 148 A.D.2d 350, 351). Given the plaintiff's showing of a likelihood of waste by the defendant corporation and the demonstration of a fraudulent transfer of assets, it was, in the circumstances, not an abuse of discretion to have granted injunctive relief (see, R J Bottling Co. v Rosenthal, 40 A.D.2d 911), or to have appointed a receiver (see, Nelson v. Nelson, 99 A.D.2d 917).
We have reviewed defendant's other arguments and find them to be without merit.
Concur — Milonas, J.P., Wallach, Kupferman and Smith, JJ.