From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nesdahl v. Hampton

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Mar 27, 2024
4:23-cv-00495-KGB (E.D. Ark. Mar. 27, 2024)

Opinion

4:23-cv-00495-KGB

03-27-2024

TIMOTHY JOSEPH NESDAHL REG #31388-009 PLAINTIFF v. MARK HAMPTON, Attorney at Law, Personal/Business, et al. DEFENDANTS


JUDGMENT

Kristine G. Baker, Chief United States District Judge

Pursuant to the Order filed on this date, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that plaintiff Timothy Joseph Nesdahl's complaint is dismissed without prejudice (Dkt. No. 2). The relief sought is denied. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an in forma pauperis appeal is considered frivolous and not in good faith.

So adjudged.


Summaries of

Nesdahl v. Hampton

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Mar 27, 2024
4:23-cv-00495-KGB (E.D. Ark. Mar. 27, 2024)
Case details for

Nesdahl v. Hampton

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY JOSEPH NESDAHL REG #31388-009 PLAINTIFF v. MARK HAMPTON, Attorney…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Mar 27, 2024

Citations

4:23-cv-00495-KGB (E.D. Ark. Mar. 27, 2024)