From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nesbitt v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Aug 31, 2022
345 So. 3d 981 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. 1D22-0795

08-31-2022

Maurice NESBITT, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Maurice Nesbitt, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Maurice Nesbitt, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

Because the trial court has ruled on the filing pending below, the Court denies the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See Ward v. State , 770 So. 2d 206, 207 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (denying a petition for writ of mandamus as moot where the trial court had ruled on the motion pending below).

Makar, Winokur, and Tanenbaum, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Nesbitt v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Aug 31, 2022
345 So. 3d 981 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Nesbitt v. State

Case Details

Full title:Maurice NESBITT, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Aug 31, 2022

Citations

345 So. 3d 981 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)