From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nesbitt v. Nesbitt

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 28, 2008
CIV-S-07-2146 LKK GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2008)

Opinion

CIV-S-07-2146 LKK GGH PS.

January 28, 2008


ORDER


On December 11, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections were filed.

Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Findings and Recommendations in full.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed December 11, 2007, are ADOPTED; and

2. The complaint is dismissed with prejudice. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and (6), and 41(b).


Summaries of

Nesbitt v. Nesbitt

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 28, 2008
CIV-S-07-2146 LKK GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2008)
Case details for

Nesbitt v. Nesbitt

Case Details

Full title:JOHN EDWARD NESBITT, Plaintiff, v. GERALDINE AGONCILLO NESBITT, MIRIAM…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 28, 2008

Citations

CIV-S-07-2146 LKK GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2008)