From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nesbit v. Fornaro

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Mar 8, 2011
Case No. 2:11-cv-00092-PMP-GWF (D. Nev. Mar. 8, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-cv-00092-PMP-GWF.

March 8, 2011


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the 2nd Notice of Violation of Special Order 109 (#11) on March 7, 2011, addressed to Plaintiff's counsel Matthew D. Spring. Section 1.B. of the Courts' Electronic Filing Procedures (enacted pursuant to Special Order 109) states, in part, "Attorneys who are admitted to the bar of this court, admitted to participate in a case pro hac vice, or who are authorized to represent the United States and its agencies, shall register as Filing Users of the System". To date, Mr. Spring has not complied. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Mr. Spring shall register with CM/ECF and a "Notice of Compliance with Special Order 109" shall be completed and filed no later than five (5) days from the date of this Order. Failure to comply may result in the issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed.

DATED this 8th day of March, 2011.


Summaries of

Nesbit v. Fornaro

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Mar 8, 2011
Case No. 2:11-cv-00092-PMP-GWF (D. Nev. Mar. 8, 2011)
Case details for

Nesbit v. Fornaro

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM NESBIT, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT L. FORNARO, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Mar 8, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:11-cv-00092-PMP-GWF (D. Nev. Mar. 8, 2011)