From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nesbit v. Elfving

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Mar 12, 2007
Civil No. 06-1608-TC (D. Or. Mar. 12, 2007)

Opinion

Civil No. 06-1608-TC.

March 12, 2007


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on February 14, 2007. The matter is now before me.See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982).See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation. This action is dismissed for plaintiff's failure to prosecute and failure to comply with a court order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Nesbit v. Elfving

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Mar 12, 2007
Civil No. 06-1608-TC (D. Or. Mar. 12, 2007)
Case details for

Nesbit v. Elfving

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN L. NESBIT, Plaintiff, v. SUE ELFVING, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Mar 12, 2007

Citations

Civil No. 06-1608-TC (D. Or. Mar. 12, 2007)