From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nero v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 13, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02717-PAB-MJW (D. Colo. Apr. 13, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02717-PAB-MJW

04-13-2012

JAMES L. NERO, individually and on behalf of a class of others similarly situated, Plaintiff(s), v. AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant(s).


MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe

It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Defendant's Compliance with Rule 26(a)(1) Disclosures and For Sanctions (docket no. 40) is DENIED for the following reasons. I find that Defendant American Family Mutual Insurance Company has already provided to Plaintiff disclosures consistent with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1). See record of the Rule 16 Scheduling Conference held on January 27, 2012, before Magistrate Judge Watanabe. Moreover, I find for those additional reasons as outlined in the Response (docket no. 47), which this court incorporates by reference, the motion should be denied. Lastly, I find that each party shall pay their own attorney fees and costs for the subject motion (docket no. 40). If Plaintiff seeks additional discovery, the Rule 16 Scheduling Order on Class Certification Only (docket no. 26), outlines the permissible discovery at this stage of this litigation.


Summaries of

Nero v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 13, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02717-PAB-MJW (D. Colo. Apr. 13, 2012)
Case details for

Nero v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:JAMES L. NERO, individually and on behalf of a class of others similarly…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Apr 13, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02717-PAB-MJW (D. Colo. Apr. 13, 2012)