From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

NERI v. SCLAFANI

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 23, 2009
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 52229 (N.Y. App. Term 2009)

Opinion

2008-875 S C.

Decided October 23, 2009.

Appeal from a judgment of the District Court of Suffolk County, First District (James P. Flanagan, J.), entered November 30, 2007. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $700.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed without costs.

PRESENT: MOLIA, J.P., NICOLAI and TANENBAUM, JJ.


Plaintiff commenced this small claims action to recover a $700 payment that she had made to defendants pursuant to the parties' oral agreement for an apartment rental. At trial, plaintiff testified that defendants had materially breached the agreement by failing to deliver the premises for occupancy on the date promised, which had forced plaintiff to obtain alternate accommodations. Plaintiff produced a receipt for the payment, which defendant Francine A. Sclafani admitted she had signed. Defendants testified that the apartment was ready for occupancy on the date promised and that plaintiff reneged on the agreement by failing to take possession. After trial, the District Court found for plaintiff.

The decision of a fact-finding court should not be disturbed on appeal unless it is obvious that the court's conclusions could not be reached under any fair interpretation of the evidence ( Claridge Gardens v Menotti, 160 AD2d 544), especially where the findings of fact rest in large measure on considerations relating to the credibility of witnesses ( id.). This standard applies with greater force to judgments rendered in the Small Claims Part of the court ( Williams v Roper, 269 AD2d 125, 126). Here, the court was required to weigh conflicting testimony as to whether defendants delivered the premises as promised. As we cannot say that plaintiff's testimony failed to support the court's determination, we conclude that the court's determination provided the parties with substantial justice according to the rules and principles of substantive law (UDCA 1807; Ross v Friedman, 269 AD2d 584; Williams, 269 AD2d at 126). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

Molia, J.P., and Nicolai, J., concur.

Tanenbaum, J., taking no part.


Summaries of

NERI v. SCLAFANI

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 23, 2009
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 52229 (N.Y. App. Term 2009)
Case details for

NERI v. SCLAFANI

Case Details

Full title:ROBYN NERI, Respondent, v. FRANCINE A. SCLAFANI and MARIO A. SCLAFANI…

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 23, 2009

Citations

2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 52229 (N.Y. App. Term 2009)
901 N.Y.S.2d 908