From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Neopost Leasing, Inc. v. Sungard Recovery Services LP

United States District Court, N.D. California
Apr 10, 2003
CASE NO. C02-313 JSW (N.D. Cal. Apr. 10, 2003)

Opinion

CASE NO. C02-313 JSW

April 10, 2003

Richard C. Vasquez, Eric W. Benisek, Morgan Miller Blair, A Law Corporation Walnut Creek, CA, Attorney for Plaintiff

Lawrence P. Riff, Steptoe Johnson LLp., Attorney for Defendant


STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL


STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Neopost Leasing, Inc. has resolved its differences with Defendant Sungard Recovery Services LP through an executed settlement agreement and mutual release of Claims and now wishes to the terminate this action with prejudice; and

WHEREAS, defendant has no objection to the termination of this action;

NOW, THEREFORE, upon the consent of the parties hereto, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the present action is dismissed with prejudice and each parties shall bear-its own costs and attorneys' fees incurred in this action.


Summaries of

Neopost Leasing, Inc. v. Sungard Recovery Services LP

United States District Court, N.D. California
Apr 10, 2003
CASE NO. C02-313 JSW (N.D. Cal. Apr. 10, 2003)
Case details for

Neopost Leasing, Inc. v. Sungard Recovery Services LP

Case Details

Full title:NEOPOST LEASING, INC. Plaintiff, vs. SUNGARD RECOVERY SERVICES LP, and…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Apr 10, 2003

Citations

CASE NO. C02-313 JSW (N.D. Cal. Apr. 10, 2003)