From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

NEO4J, Inc. v. Purethink, LLC

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jun 28, 2022
18-cv-07182-EJD (SVK) (N.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2022)

Opinion

18-cv-07182-EJD (SVK)

06-28-2022

NEO4J, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. PURETHINK, LLC, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ON JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER BRIEF

RE: DKT. NO. 145

SUSAN VAN KEULEN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Before the Court is the Parties' joint letter brief regarding a discovery dispute over Defendant iGov Inc.'s production of documents and an interrogatory response. Dkt. 145. The Court held a hearing on June 28, 2022, pursuant to which Counsel appeared and responded to the Court's questions at Dkt. 148. The Parties agree that the relevant time period for damages is 2018-present. The Court's rulings on the production of documents are contained in Exhibit A. Amended responses ordered in Exhibit A are due on July 8, 2022. Supplemental productions are due July 19, 2022. The request to compel an interrogatory response, to the extent not resolved by the supplemental document production, is DENIED. The interrogatory as posed is better suited for a 30(b)6 deposition.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

NEO4J, Inc. v. Purethink, LLC

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jun 28, 2022
18-cv-07182-EJD (SVK) (N.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2022)
Case details for

NEO4J, Inc. v. Purethink, LLC

Case Details

Full title:NEO4J, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. PURETHINK, LLC, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jun 28, 2022

Citations

18-cv-07182-EJD (SVK) (N.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2022)