From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nenigar v. Doherty

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SECTION P
Apr 9, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:13-cv-3088 (W.D. La. Apr. 9, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:13-cv-3088

04-09-2014

RICHARD NENIGAR FED. REG. #14026-035 v JUDGE REBECCA DOHERTY


JUDGE RICHARD T. HAIK, SR.


MAGISTRATE JUDGE C. MICHAEL HILL


JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, determining that the findings are correct under the applicable law, and noting the absence of objections to the Report and Recommendation in the record;

IT IS RECOMMENDED that Nenigar's Bivens complaint [Doc. 10] and the various documents filed in conjunction therewith [Docs. 1, 1-2, and 9] be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous, for failing to state a claim for which relief may be granted, and for seeking monetary relief from a party who is immune from suit pursuant to § 1915(e)(2) (B) and § 1915A(b).

THUS DONE AND SIGNED, in chambers, Lafayette, Louisiana, on this 9th day of April, 2014.

__________

RICHARD T. HAIK, SR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Nenigar v. Doherty

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SECTION P
Apr 9, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:13-cv-3088 (W.D. La. Apr. 9, 2014)
Case details for

Nenigar v. Doherty

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD NENIGAR FED. REG. #14026-035 v JUDGE REBECCA DOHERTY

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SECTION P

Date published: Apr 9, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:13-cv-3088 (W.D. La. Apr. 9, 2014)