holding that expert's improper testimony that in her opinion child's father was person who committed sexual battery upon child was not preserved for appellate review where there was no contemporaneous objection at trial, nor was it fundamental error
Summary of this case from McQuirk v. StateNo. 88-1790.
June 26, 1989.
C.A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 865 F. 2d 530.
holding that expert's improper testimony that in her opinion child's father was person who committed sexual battery upon child was not preserved for appellate review where there was no contemporaneous objection at trial, nor was it fundamental error
Summary of this case from McQuirk v. Staterecognizing in dicta that Delaware as a matter of law may not permit an award of postjudgment interest on prejudgment interest
Summary of this case from David J. Stone Co. v. Silversteinquashing mandatory order for wage assignment based on procedural irregularities under companion chapter 252D
Summary of this case from State ex Rel. Allee v. Gochaapplying Delaware law
Summary of this case from Mattvidi v. NationsbankFull title:NEMOURS FOUNDATION ET AL. v. PIERCE ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jun 26, 1989
Such an extended cessation of use creates a presumption, here unrebutted, that any trademark rights J.H.…
Hernandez v. StateThe state has an interest in protecting child victims of sexual or other abuse from the additional trauma of…