From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nelson-Waller v. Waller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 31, 2009
60 A.D.3d 1068 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2008-07633.

March 31, 2009.

In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the husband appeals from an order of protection of the Family Court, Orange County (Bivona, J.), dated July 15, 2008, which, after a hearing, and upon, in effect, a finding that he committed the family offense of disorderly conduct, inter alia, directed him to stay away from the wife for a period of two years.

Barry B. Silver, New Windsor, N.Y., for appellant.

Joseph J. Artrip, New Windsor, N.Y., for respondent.

Before: Skelos, J.P., Dillon, Covello and Leventhal, JJ.


Ordered that the order of protection is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

"A family offense must be established by a `fair preponderance of the evidence' (Family Ct Act § 832). The Family Court's determination regarding the credibility of witnesses must be given great weight on appeal unless clearly unsupported by the record" ( Matter of Hunt v Hunt, 51 AD3d 924, 925). The record supports the Family Court's finding that, based on a preponderance of the evidence, the husband committed acts constituting the family offense of disorderly conduct, warranting the issuance of the order of protection.


Summaries of

Nelson-Waller v. Waller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 31, 2009
60 A.D.3d 1068 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Nelson-Waller v. Waller

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of TANYA D. NELSON-WALLER, Respondent, v. MICHAEL L. WALLER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 31, 2009

Citations

60 A.D.3d 1068 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 2608
875 N.Y.S.2d 810

Citing Cases

In re Mercedes

The uncontroverted testimony of the Mental Health Services psychologist revealed that the mother had…

Angela C. v. Harris K.

Respondent's conviction on four counts of aggravated harassment in the second degree as to petitioner serves…