From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nelson v. Unknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 11, 2018
No. 2:18-cv-0344 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 11, 2018)

Opinion

No. 2:18-cv-0344 CKD P

04-11-2018

DEWAYNE NELSON, Plaintiff, v. UNKNOWN, Defendants.


ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

On February 28, 2018, Mr. Nelson was ordered to file a complaint and to either file an application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee within 30 days. Mr. Nelson was warned that failure to comply with the court's order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Mr. Nelson has not responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case; and

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: April 11, 2018

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1
nels0344.frs


Summaries of

Nelson v. Unknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 11, 2018
No. 2:18-cv-0344 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 11, 2018)
Case details for

Nelson v. Unknown

Case Details

Full title:DEWAYNE NELSON, Plaintiff, v. UNKNOWN, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 11, 2018

Citations

No. 2:18-cv-0344 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 11, 2018)