From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nelson v. Swarthout

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 30, 2011
No. 2:09-cv-2793 WBS KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:09-cv-2793 WBS KJN P.

August 30, 2011


ORDER


Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at the present time.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's August 12, 2011 motion for appointment of counsel is denied.

DATED: August 29, 2011


Summaries of

Nelson v. Swarthout

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 30, 2011
No. 2:09-cv-2793 WBS KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2011)
Case details for

Nelson v. Swarthout

Case Details

Full title:DENNIS LOUIS NELSON, Petitioner, v. GARY SWARTHOUT, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 30, 2011

Citations

No. 2:09-cv-2793 WBS KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2011)