From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nelson v. Stueve

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 4, 1991
821 P.2d 439 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

PB 86-8706; CA A66583

Argued and submitted November 1, reversed and remanded with instructions December 4, 1991

Appeal from Circuit Court, Benton County.

Robert S. Gardner, Judge.

Jane K. Hickman, Oregon Legal Services Corp., Albany, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

No appearance for respondent.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded with instructions to enter an order terminating guardianship and conservatorship.


This is an appeal from an order denying appellant's motion to terminate the guardianship and conservatorship held by respondent. We reverse and remand.

On de novo review, we conclude that appellant is not an "incapacitated person" at the present time. She is capable of meeting essential health and safety requirements and managing her own affairs. She has no mental illness. She is an alcoholic, but we note that that condition is in remission and that she has been and is currently sober. There is no need to continue the guardianship or conservatorship.

An incapacitated person is
"an adult whose ability to receive and evaluate information effectively or communicate decisions is impaired to such an extent that the person presently lacks the capacity to meet the essential requirements for the person's physical health or safety or to manage the person's financial resources." ORS 126.003(4).

Reversed and remanded with instructions to enter an order terminating guardianship and conservatorship.


Summaries of

Nelson v. Stueve

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 4, 1991
821 P.2d 439 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Nelson v. Stueve

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Guardianship and Conservatorship of Irene Marie…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 4, 1991

Citations

821 P.2d 439 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)
821 P.2d 439