Opinion
NO. 14-13-00689-CR
07-10-2014
GLEN SHANNON NELSON, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 10, 2014.
On Appeal from the 174th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 1375125
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant appeals his conviction for aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon. Appellant's appointed counsel filed a brief in which they conclude the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811-13 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
A copy of counsels' brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). At appellant's request, the record was provided to him. As of this date, more than 45 days have passed since appellant received the record, and no pro se response has been filed.
We have carefully reviewed the record and counsels' brief and agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the record. We are not to address the merits of each claim raised in an Anders brief or a pro se response when we have determined there are no arguable grounds for review. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827-28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Busby, and Wise. Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).