From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nelson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 10, 1987
508 So. 2d 48 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

No. 4-86-1917.

June 10, 1987.

Petition for review from the Circuit Court, Broward County, Robert Tyson, J.

Jon H. Gutmacher, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Jr., Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Noel A. Pelella, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent.


By petition for writ of certiorari, Barry Nelson (Nelson) seeks review of a judgment of the Broward County Circuit Court denying a petition for writ of certiorari directed to an order of the Broward County Court, which suspended Nelson's driver's license pursuant to section 322.261, Florida Statutes (1983).

It appears that Nelson had been arrested for driving under the influence. He was asked to submit to a breathalizer test; however, before deciding whether to submit Nelson requested the opportunity to contact his attorney. The police declined to allow him to contact counsel, he declined to take the test, and the police treated this as a refusal to submit to the breathalizer test. This resulted in an implied consent hearing in the Broward County Court and an order suspending Nelson's driver's license pursuant to section 322.261, Florida Statutes. On petition for writ of certiorari the circuit court denied the writ, upholding the county court rulings that a defendant arrested for driving under the influence is not entitled to an opportunity to consult a lawyer prior to submitting to a breathalizer test, and that neither Article I, Section 9 of the Florida Constitution, the Sixth or Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal Constitution, nor section 901.24, Florida Statutes mandates otherwise.

We have carefully considered petitioner's various arguments in favor of quashing the circuit court's order under review and decline to do so. Instead, we would align ourselves with the conclusion reached in the recent decision of the Third District Court of Appeal in State v. Hoch, 500 So.2d 597 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986), which answers all of petitioner's arguments.

Certiorari denied.

DOWNEY, LETTS and DELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Nelson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 10, 1987
508 So. 2d 48 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

Nelson v. State

Case Details

Full title:BARRY NELSON, PETITIONER, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jun 10, 1987

Citations

508 So. 2d 48 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Citing Cases

Larmer v. Dept. of Highway Safety

Concern for public safety, however, cannot sweep away legitimate arguments which militate against the…

Langelier v. Coleman

We note, however, that Florida courts have declined to find such a right. Hoch, 500 So.2d at 600; accord,…