From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

NELSON v. SPRINT/UNITED MANAGEMENT CO

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Sep 18, 2006
Civil Action No. 05-2350-KHV (D. Kan. Sep. 18, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-2350-KHV.

September 18, 2006


ORDER


In response to Defendant's Motion For Summary Judgment (Doc. #29) filed June 2, 2006, plaintiff attempts to controvert and establish facts with documents which she has not authenticated.See Plaintiff's Response And Brief In Opposition To Defendant's Motion For Summary Judgment (Doc. #31) filed June 26, 2006. For purposes of opposing defendant's motion, plaintiff must authenticate each document and attach it to an affidavit which meets the requirements of Rule 56(e). See Taylor v. Principi, 141 Fed. Appx. 705, 708, 2005 WL 1519099, *3 (10th Cir. 2005); Boilermaker-Blacksmith Nat. Pension Fund v. Gendron, 96 F. Supp.2d 1202, 1205 n. 2 (D. Kan. 2000). Accordingly, the Court will not consider plaintiff's unauthenticated documents unless on or before September 20, 2006, plaintiff provides appropriate authentication.


Summaries of

NELSON v. SPRINT/UNITED MANAGEMENT CO

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Sep 18, 2006
Civil Action No. 05-2350-KHV (D. Kan. Sep. 18, 2006)
Case details for

NELSON v. SPRINT/UNITED MANAGEMENT CO

Case Details

Full title:JENNIFER NELSON, Plaintiff, v. SPRINT/UNITED MANAGEMENT CO., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Kansas

Date published: Sep 18, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 05-2350-KHV (D. Kan. Sep. 18, 2006)