From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nelson v. Spitzer

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Apr 7, 2008
9:07-CV-1241 (TJM) (RFT) (N.D.N.Y. Apr. 7, 2008)

Opinion

9:07-CV-1241 (TJM) (RFT).

April 7, 2008

DENNIS NELSON, 94-B-0694, Great Meadow Correctional Facility, Comstock, New York, Plaintiff, pro se.


DECISION and ORDER


Plaintiff Dennis Nelson commenced this action by filing a pro se civil rights complaint, together with an in forma pauperis application. Dkt. Nos. 1, 2. A review of plaintiff's prior proceedings revealed that plaintiff had three "strikes" and, thus, should not be permitted to proceed with this action in forma pauperis. See Nelson v. Lee, 9:05-CV-1096 (DEP) (NAM), Dkt. Nos. 44 and 47; Nelson v. Hamel, 9:07-CV-540 (GLS) (RFT), Dkt. No. 4; and Nelson v. Conway, No. 04-CV-6163CJS(Fe) (W.D.N.Y. Apr. 21, 2004) (referencing additional strikes in the Western District of New York). Therefore, by Order of this Court filed January 28, 2008, plaintiff's in forma pauperis application was denied and plaintiff was directed to, within thirty (30) days, (1) prepay the $350.00 filing fee in full and (2) file an amended complaint or his action would be dismissed. Dkt. No. 7. On February 8, 2008, plaintiff filed an amended complaint. Dkt. No. 10.

Plaintiff had previously filed twenty-two other civil rights actions in this District. Several of plaintiff's filings relate to the medical condition of his leg. See Nelson v. Lee, et al., 9:05-CV-1096 (NAM) (DEP); Nelson v. Roberts, 9:06-CV-0518 (GLS) (DRH); and Nelson v. Smith, et al., 9:06-CV-0477 (GLS) (GHL).

As more fully discussed in the January 29, 2008 Decision and Order, the court also concluded that the claims raised by plaintiff in the present action do not fall within the "imminent danger" exception. See Dkt. No. 7.

Although more than sixty days have elapsed since plaintiff was directed to prepay the $350.00 filing fee, plaintiff has not paid the fee, nor has he requested an additional extension of time to do so. Therefore, in accordance with this Court's January 29, 2008 Decision and Order, this action is dismissed without prejudice.

WHEREFORE, it is hereby

ORDERED that for the reasons set forth above, this action is dismissed without prejudice, and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court serve a copy of this Decision and Order on plaintiff in accordance with the Local Rules.


Summaries of

Nelson v. Spitzer

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Apr 7, 2008
9:07-CV-1241 (TJM) (RFT) (N.D.N.Y. Apr. 7, 2008)
Case details for

Nelson v. Spitzer

Case Details

Full title:DENNIS NELSON, Plaintiff, v. ELIOT SPITZER; DAVID ROCK, Superintendent…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Apr 7, 2008

Citations

9:07-CV-1241 (TJM) (RFT) (N.D.N.Y. Apr. 7, 2008)