From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nelson v. Rockingham Cnty.

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Mar 8, 2024
1:23-cv-488 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 8, 2024)

Opinion

1:23-cv-488

03-08-2024

MICHAEL PAUL NELSON, Plaintiff, v. ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Loretta C. Biggs United States District Judge

The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the Court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and on February 20, 2024, was served on the parties in this action. (ECF Nos. 32, 33.) No objections were filed within the time prescribed by § 636.

The Court hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that moving Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, (ECF No. 25), is GRANTED IN PART and that the ADA and Rehabilitation Act claims against Defendants Town of Madison, Keith Benefield, and Matthew Michael are DISMISSED, and that the case is STAYED pending resolution of Plaintiffs criminal trial in state superior court. Plaintiff is directed to file a Status Report within 30 days of the conclusion of the proceedings in state superior court.


Summaries of

Nelson v. Rockingham Cnty.

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Mar 8, 2024
1:23-cv-488 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 8, 2024)
Case details for

Nelson v. Rockingham Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL PAUL NELSON, Plaintiff, v. ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina

Date published: Mar 8, 2024

Citations

1:23-cv-488 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 8, 2024)