From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nelson v. Robinson

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 17, 2011
454 F. App'x 174 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 11-6785

11-17-2011

GEORGE PATTON NELSON, III, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHERYL ROBINSON, Superintendent for the Medical Department of the Richmond City Jail. Sued individually and in her official capacity; PRUITT, Undersheriff, Richmond City Jail and Chaplain of the Richmond City Jail, sued individually and in official capacity, Defendants - Appellees.

George Patton Nelson, III, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Douglas Lane, THOMPSON MCMULLAN PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:08-cv-00603-HEH)

Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Patton Nelson, III, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Douglas Lane, THOMPSON MCMULLAN PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

George Patton Nelson, III, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny as moot Nelson's motion for injunctive relief pending appeal, and we affirm the judgment below for the reasons stated by the district court. Nelson v. Robinson, No. 3:08-cv-00603-HEH (E.D. Va. June 9, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Nelson v. Robinson

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 17, 2011
454 F. App'x 174 (4th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Nelson v. Robinson

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE PATTON NELSON, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHERYL ROBINSON…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Nov 17, 2011

Citations

454 F. App'x 174 (4th Cir. 2011)