Nelson v. Nelson

2 Citing cases

  1. Martell v. Tex. Concrete Enter. Readymix, Inc.

    595 S.W.3d 279 (Tex. App. 2020)   Cited 10 times
    Clarifying that "[Creaven ] did not suggest that all pre-2012 cases concerning Rule 107 had been abrogated"

    Whether service strictly complies with the rules is a question of law which we review de novo. Nelson v. Nelson , No. 14-16-00602-CV, 2017 WL 2484378, at *2 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] June 8, 2017, no pet.) (mem. op.). III.

  2. Jackson v. Cain-Stegemoller

    NO. 14-18-00207-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 8, 2019)   Cited 1 times

    Tex. R. Civ. P. 106. Generally, we review de novo the trial court's authorization of substituted service and the rendering of a default judgment based on such service. See Furst, 176 S.W.3d at 869-70; see also Nelson v. Nelson, No. 14-16-00602-CV, 2017 WL 2484378, at *2 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] June 8, 2017, no pet.) (mem. op.) ("Whether service strictly complies with the rules is a question of law that we review de novo."). II. Background