From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nelson v. Murphy

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 3, 2010
No. CIV S-09-0308 FCD KJM P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 3, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-0308 FCD KJM P.

December 3, 2010


ORDER


On November 29, 2010, plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed November 10, 2010, denying appointment of counsel. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed November 10, 2010, is affirmed.

DATED: December 3, 2010.


Summaries of

Nelson v. Murphy

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 3, 2010
No. CIV S-09-0308 FCD KJM P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 3, 2010)
Case details for

Nelson v. Murphy

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK OTIS NELSON, Plaintiff, v. MURPHY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 3, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-09-0308 FCD KJM P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 3, 2010)