From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nelson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Jan 11, 2010
Civil No. 07-2326 ADM/JSM (D. Minn. Jan. 11, 2010)

Summary

In Nelson, this Court determined that a paralegal working on an ERISA action of similar complexity as the present case should be compensated at a rate of $110 per hour. 2010 WL 153040, at *6.

Summary of this case from Frerichs v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co.

Opinion

Civil No. 07-2326 ADM/JSM.

January 11, 2010


ORDER


Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation dated December 22, 2009, of Magistrate Judge Janie S. Mayeron. There have been no objections to said Recommendation and based upon all the files and records herein IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

Plaintiff Nelson's Motion for Award of Attorney's Fees and Costs [Docket No. 46] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Nelson is awarded attorney's fees and costs in the amount of $58,842.26.


Summaries of

Nelson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Jan 11, 2010
Civil No. 07-2326 ADM/JSM (D. Minn. Jan. 11, 2010)

In Nelson, this Court determined that a paralegal working on an ERISA action of similar complexity as the present case should be compensated at a rate of $110 per hour. 2010 WL 153040, at *6.

Summary of this case from Frerichs v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co.

In Nelson, this Court determined that a paralegal working on an ERISA action of similar complexity as the present case should be compensated at a rate of $110 per hour. 2010 WL 153040, at *6.

Summary of this case from Frerichs v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co.
Case details for

Nelson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:TODD W. NELSON, Plaintiff, v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Jan 11, 2010

Citations

Civil No. 07-2326 ADM/JSM (D. Minn. Jan. 11, 2010)

Citing Cases

Whitehouse v. UNUM Life Ins. Co. of Am.

The amount of interest is calculated by applying the rate in 28 U.S.C. § 1961 to the amounts from the months…

Tussey v. ABB Inc.

Further, the majority of district courts within the Circuit have agreed with this interpretation of Mansker…