From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nelson v. Hargis

Supreme Court of Florida
Feb 15, 2006
924 So. 2d 809 (Fla. 2006)

Opinion

Case No. SC05-1242.

February 15, 2006.

Lower Tribunal No. 2D05-155.


As petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the reinstatement of Nelson v. Hargis, case number 2D05-155, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000) (holding that in order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, the petitioner must show that he has a clear legal right to performance of the requested act, that the respondent has an indisputable legal duty to perform that act, and that no other adequate remedy exists).

WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, CANTERO and BELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Nelson v. Hargis

Supreme Court of Florida
Feb 15, 2006
924 So. 2d 809 (Fla. 2006)
Case details for

Nelson v. Hargis

Case Details

Full title:FREDERICK L. NELSON, Petitioner(s) v. CATHY S. HARGIS, Respondent(s)

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Feb 15, 2006

Citations

924 So. 2d 809 (Fla. 2006)