From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nelson v. Fulton Cty

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jul 15, 2003
585 S.E.2d 710 (Ga. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

A03A1484.

Decided July 15, 2003

Zoning. Fulton Superior Court. Before Judge Wyatt Cummings Moore.

Ruth Nelson, pro se.

Overtis H. Brantley, Larry W. Ramsey, Jr., Valerie A. Ross, for appellees.


Ruth Nelson filed a complaint seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against Fulton County and the Fulton County Board of Commissioners (collectively, the "County"), challenging their denial of her application to rezone a parcel of property. The superior court dismissed Nelson's complaint as untimely. Nelson filed a direct appeal. Because "all appeals in zoning cases require an application," we dismiss this direct appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

O.S. Advertising Co. of Georgia, Inc. v. Rubin, 267 Ga. 723, 724 ( 482 S.E.2d 295) (1997), citing Trend Development Corp. v. Douglas County, 259 Ga. 425, 426(1) ( 383 S.E.2d 123) (1989).

Under OCGA § 5-6-35(a)(1), an appeal of a superior court's review of an administrative agency's decision requires an application for discretionary appeal. Trend Development Corp. set out a bright-line rule that all appeals to either appellate court in zoning cases must come by application. In Ferguson v. Composite State Bd. c., the Supreme Court clarified that a party to a decision rendered by an administrative body must follow the appeal procedure dictated by the underlying subject matter. The Supreme Court went on to state in Fulton County v. Congregation of Anshei Chesed that "a party to the decision of an administrative agency may not avoid the requirements of filing an application to appeal in the appellate courts by filing in superior court an action from which a direct appeal is authorized by OCGA § 5-6-34." Accordingly, Nelson may not circumvent the discretionary appeal requirement in this Court by filing a declaratory action in the superior court. Pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-35(a)(1), Nelson was required to file an application to appeal the dismissal of her suit against the County.

Trend Development Corp., supra at 426(1).

Id. at 256-257(1).

Id. at 857(1).

Appeal dismissed. Johnson, P.J., and Eldridge, J., concur.


DECIDED JULY 15, 2003.


Summaries of

Nelson v. Fulton Cty

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jul 15, 2003
585 S.E.2d 710 (Ga. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Nelson v. Fulton Cty

Case Details

Full title:NELSON v. FULTON COUNTY et al

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jul 15, 2003

Citations

585 S.E.2d 710 (Ga. Ct. App. 2003)
585 S.E.2d 710

Citing Cases

Best Tobacco, Inc. v. Department of Revenue

See Ferguson v. Composite State Bd. of Med. Examiners, 275 Ga. at 257 (1), 258, n. 19; cf. Ga. Dept. of…

Schumacher v. City of Roswell

Furthermore, it is undisputed that the City Council's approval of the UDC and map rezoned the properties of…