Opinion
CASE NO.: SC13-583 Lower Tribunal No.: 4D11-3295 Lower Tribunal No.: 2010CA018553XXXXMB
08-14-2013
MICHAEL S. NELSON Petitioner(s) v. MICHAEL D. CREWS, ETC. Respondent(s)
Petitioner has submitted a petition for writ of habeas corpus. To the extent petitioner seeks habeas corpus relief, the petition is hereby denied as successive. See Jenkins v. Wainwright, 322 So. 2d 477, 478 (Fla. 1975) (declaring that once a petitioner seeks relief in a particular court by means of a petition for extraordinary writ, he has picked his forum and is not entitled to a second or third opportunity for the same relief by the same writ in a different court). To the extent petitioner seeks review of the decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal in case number 4D11-3295, the petition is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Grate v. State, 750 So. 2d 625 (Fla. 1999). PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, and LABARGA, JJ., concur. A True Copy
Test:
______________
Thomas D. Hall
Clerk, Supreme Court
kb
Served:
MICHAEL S. NELSON
JENNIFER ALANI PARKER
HON. MARILYN BEUTTENMULLER, CLERK
HON. PAMELA JO BONDI
HON. SHARON BOCK, CLERK