From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nelson v. Campbell

Supreme Court of Florida
May 24, 2005
905 So. 2d 126 (Fla. 2005)

Opinion

Case No. SC04-2458.

May 24, 2005.

Lower Tribunal No. 1D04-4661.


As petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief requested, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000) (holding that in order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, the petitioner must show that he has a clear legal right to performance of the requested act, that the respondent has an indisputable legal duty to perform that act, and that no other adequate remedy exists). Accordingly, all pending motions are also denied.

WELLS, ANSTEAD, QUINCE, CANTERO and BELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Nelson v. Campbell

Supreme Court of Florida
May 24, 2005
905 So. 2d 126 (Fla. 2005)
Case details for

Nelson v. Campbell

Case Details

Full title:EARNEST HOWARD NELSON A/K/A ERNEST HOWARD NELSON, Petitioner(s) v. LARRY…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: May 24, 2005

Citations

905 So. 2d 126 (Fla. 2005)