From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nelson v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 21, 2012
CIV S- 11-2451 GGH (E.D. Cal. Aug. 21, 2012)

Opinion

CIV S- 11-2451 GGH

08-21-2012

JOHANAN PHILLIP NELSON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Plaintiff filed his complaint on September 13, 2011; service was executed upon defendant on December 13, 2011. On March 12, 2012, defendant filed with this court, and served upon plaintiff by mail, his answer and the administrative transcript.

Pursuant to this court's Scheduling Order (and allowing three days for service by mail, Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(e)), plaintiff was required to file a motion for summary judgment and/or remand by April 26, 2012 (45 days after service of the answer and administrative transcript). Plaintiff has done neither, and has not communicated with this court since the filing of his complaint.

ACCORDINGLY, plaintiff is ordered to show cause in writing within fourteen days of the filed date of this order why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Failure to timely file the required writing will result in a recommendation that the case be dismissed.

As both parties have not consented to proceed before the magistrate judge, the Clerk shall assign a district judge to the case in addition to the undersigned.

Gregory G. Hollows

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Nelson v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 21, 2012
CIV S- 11-2451 GGH (E.D. Cal. Aug. 21, 2012)
Case details for

Nelson v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:JOHANAN PHILLIP NELSON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 21, 2012

Citations

CIV S- 11-2451 GGH (E.D. Cal. Aug. 21, 2012)